Our friends at the Center for Urban Research in New York have
done some spatial data analysis on the effects of October’s Superstorm Sandy. This was incorporated into WNYC’s article “Sandy
by the Numbers,” at http://www.wnyc.org/blogs/wnyc-news-blog/2013/jan/28/see-sandy-numbers/ which puts some provocative numbers to the effects of Sandy, including deaths by state and costs of storm damage.
Interestingly from an environmental justice viewpoint, in
NYC the people who were directly affected by Sandy (in terms of storm surge) were slightly less affluent than
the people not affected, whilst in New Jersey it was the reverse. But for each of the areas, the incomes of the
affected versus the unaffected were remarkably similar, and seem to represent neither
the richest nor the poorest residents. The
percentage of NJ vs NYC residents living in areas impacted by storm surge from
Sandy was also very close: 10.9% and 11.1% respectively, and the $ estimates
for disaster costs were also very close for the two areas. Now if only we can get those nimrod Congress people
to stop playing games with disaster relief and recovery support, we might be
able to get the affected people back to their pre-Sandy lives. (but please don’t rebuild on the barrier
islands anymore!)
Thanks for sending, Kristen, and thanks also for working on the project and analyzing and compiling the data.
And check out my older post on Best Visualizations of Sandy at http://geographer-at-large.blogspot.com/2012/10/best-visualizations-of-hurricane-sandy.html
No comments:
Post a Comment